Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature buildkite #186

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024
Merged

Feature buildkite #186

merged 14 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

quffaro
Copy link
Member

@quffaro quffaro commented Jan 16, 2024

Adding Buildkite functionality

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (4cafa46) 88.85% compared to head (ea53487) 78.39%.
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #186       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   88.85%   78.39%   -10.47%     
===========================================
  Files           4        4               
  Lines         359      523      +164     
===========================================
+ Hits          319      410       +91     
- Misses         40      113       +73     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jpfairbanks
Copy link
Member

I think that if we just request multiple 16 cores from slurm and pass julia -t 16 in the buildkite and the matrix multiplication should be faster.

@jpfairbanks
Copy link
Member

@quffaro
Copy link
Member Author

quffaro commented Feb 2, 2024

@jpfairbanks Following up here. The .buildkite workflow specifies 32 cores to ask from SLURM. The "pmap" feature on the literate docs will be merged in branch #193 . I'm going to merge this feature so future branches will have buildkite functionality.

@quffaro quffaro merged commit e7758f4 into main Feb 2, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants